Lesson Plan & Education
Writing Services
Standards-aligned lesson plans, curriculum units, IEPs, edTPA commentary, and teaching philosophy statements — written by M.Ed and Ed.D educators with real classroom experience.
Lesson plans delivered
On-time delivery rate
Education specialists
Fastest turnaround
The Science of Instructional Design
Effective lesson planning requires fluency in learning theory, standards interpretation, assessment design, and classroom differentiation. Every document we produce integrates these elements into a coherent, defensible instructional plan grounded in published educational research.
Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy
Learning objectives must target the correct cognitive level. Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy — Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, Create — provides the framework for writing measurable objectives using appropriate action verbs. “Students will compare two ecosystem types” targets analysis. “Students will construct a food web model” targets creation.
Objectives written at the wrong cognitive level are a documented point of deduction on lesson plan rubrics. We ensure each objective is measurable, achievable within the time allocated, and directly aligned to the standard cited and the chosen assessment method.
Understanding by Design (UbD)
Understanding by Design (Wiggins & McTighe) reverses conventional lesson sequencing. Instead of starting with activities, it begins with desired results: what should students understand at the end, and what evidence would prove it? Assessments are designed before instructional activities — a process called Backward Design.
UbD prevents activity-focused teaching where content is covered but learning is not verified. It is the standard framework for curriculum unit design in M.Ed programs and is required by most graduate curriculum planning assignments. We produce full Stage 1, Stage 2, and Stage 3 unit plans.
Differentiated Instruction
A single lesson plan must address the full spectrum of learners — English Language Learners, students with IEPs, students performing above grade level, and the majority of on-level students. Differentiation addresses content, process, product, and environment simultaneously.
We write differentiation sections covering at least three learner profiles. For ELL students: sentence frames, visual scaffolds, and tiered vocabulary. For students with IEPs: specific accommodations tied to stated IEP goals. For advanced learners: extension tasks that deepen complexity without simply adding volume.
Learning Theories We Apply
Education Writing Services
We handle the full range of education program deliverables from single-period plans to multi-semester curricula and doctoral capstone research.
Lesson Plans
Full lesson plans with learning objectives (Bloom’s-level verb specified), materials list, advance preparation notes, hook/anticipatory set, step-by-step instructional sequence with timing, guided practice, independent practice, closure activity, formative assessment, and differentiation section. Models: 5E Inquiry, SIOP, Madeline Hunter Direct Instruction, Culturally Responsive formats.
The SIOP model is written with dual content and language objectives, vocabulary instruction embedded in the lesson flow, interaction activities, and review/assessment phases. Madeline Hunter plans include explicit input, modeling, and checking-for-understanding scripts where required by the assignment rubric.
Curriculum Unit Plans
UbD-based unit plans that organize a sequence of lessons around essential questions, enduring understandings, and transfer goals. Components include: unit overview, Stage 1 (desired results), Stage 2 (evidence — pre-assessment, formative checkpoints, summative task with rubric), and Stage 3 (learning plan with pacing guide). Each lesson in the unit maps to the unit’s standards codes and learning progression.
Scope and sequence documents are available for full-semester or full-year curriculum mapping assignments in any subject area, PreK through Grade 12.
Teaching Philosophy Statements
Teaching philosophy statements must do three things: articulate beliefs about learning, explain the teacher’s role in supporting that learning, and show how those beliefs translate into observable classroom practice. Citing a theorist by name is insufficient — the statement must connect the theory to a specific instructional approach.
We ground philosophy statements in Vygotsky, Dewey, Freire, Ladson-Billings, or Universal Design for Learning depending on your focus area and grade level. Length and register are calibrated to the submission context: undergraduate portfolio, graduate application, or competitive teaching position.
IEP & 504 Plans
Individualized Education Programs under IDEA require a legally specific structure: present levels of performance (PLOP), measurable annual goals, a description of special education services, accommodation and modification lists (legally distinct from each other), and transition planning for eligible students. All goals are written in SMART format with a baseline, target behavior, criterion for mastery, and evaluation timeline.
We write IEPs for specific learning disabilities (dyslexia, dyscalculia), autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disabilities, emotional-behavioral disorders, and speech-language impairments.
edTPA Commentary Support
The edTPA is a subject-specific performance assessment required for teacher certification in over 40 U.S. states. Task 1 (Planning) requires a learning segment rationale that connects instructional decisions to student context, prior knowledge, and standards. Task 2 (Instruction) requires clip-specific commentary on academic language and student engagement. Task 3 (Assessment) requires analysis of student work patterns and next instructional steps.
We write all three task commentaries across subject handbooks: Elementary Literacy, Elementary Mathematics, Secondary ELA, Secondary Science, Secondary Mathematics, and Early Childhood Education. Commentary uses the specific rubric language required by each handbook.
Ed.D Capstone Projects
Ed.D capstone projects (Dissertation in Practice or Action Research) focus on solving a real educational problem in a specific organizational context. They require a problem-of-practice statement, systematic literature review, data collection methodology, improvement intervention design, and Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle documentation.
We assist with literature reviews in educational leadership, curriculum theory, and policy; findings write-up; improvement framework design; and final chapter completion. View Dissertation Services →
The Complete Lesson Kit
Every lesson plan we produce is a complete instructional package — not a bare outline. All elements are delivered in editable format so you can adjust them for your classroom context.
Standards-Aligned Objectives
SMART objectives with explicit standard codes (CCSS, NGSS, TEKS, or state-specific), written with Bloom’s-level action verbs appropriate to the cognitive demand of the standard.
Full Instructional Sequence
Timed step-by-step flow including hook, input and modeling, guided practice, independent practice, and closure. Scripts and teacher talk included where required.
Student-Facing Materials
Custom handouts, graphic organizers, exit ticket prompts, and slide deck outlines. Materials adapted for differentiated learner groups as specified.
Assessment Package
Formative checkpoints (exit tickets, observation checklists, quick-write prompts) and summative tasks with analytic or holistic rubrics calibrated to the learning objectives.
Lesson Plan Models: At a Glance
| Model | Best For | Key Phases | Typical Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5E Inquiry | Science, STEM, inquiry-driven subjects | Engage → Explore → Explain → Elaborate → Evaluate | Elementary and secondary science; NGSS-aligned coursework |
| SIOP | ELL-inclusive classrooms; content + language objectives | Preparation, Interaction, Practice/Application, Review/Assessment | ESL endorsement programs; multilingual classroom assignments |
| Madeline Hunter | Direct instruction; structured practice | Set → Input → Modeling → Guided Practice → Check → IP → Closure | Traditional lesson plan courses; state teacher evaluations |
| UbD (Backward Design) | Unit and curriculum design | Stage 1: Goals → Stage 2: Evidence → Stage 3: Learning Plan | M.Ed curriculum courses; school curriculum committee projects |
| Culturally Responsive | Diverse, equity-centered classrooms | Asset mapping, cultural connections, critical consciousness, student agency | Urban education programs; social justice pedagogy coursework |
Standards Alignment & edTPA Compliance
A lesson plan without standards alignment is incomplete by definition. Every objective, activity, and assessment we write maps directly to the standard codes in your brief. We cite the exact standard language and use it to justify instructional decisions — a requirement in edTPA commentary and in most lesson plan grading rubrics.
The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) govern ELA and Mathematics instruction across 41 states and the District of Columbia. CCSS-aligned objectives must distinguish between Reading standards for Literature (RL) and Informational Text (RI), Writing standards (W), Speaking and Listening standards (SL), and Language standards (L) at the correct grade band. For mathematics, we differentiate between content standards and the eight Standards for Mathematical Practice.
For science assignments, the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) require a three-dimensional approach integrating Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCI), Crosscutting Concepts (CCC), and Science and Engineering Practices (SEP). We write performance expectations correctly and distinguish between what students should know and what they should be able to do with that knowledge.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS)
ELA (RL, RI, W, SL, L) and Mathematics content standards plus Mathematical Practice Standards — all grade bands PreK–12.
Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)
Three-dimensional standards with correctly cited DCI, CCC, and SEP codes for all grade bands.
TEKS (Texas) & State-Specific Frameworks
Virginia SOLs, Florida NGSSS, Massachusetts Frameworks, California ELD Standards, and others with accurate strand and expectation codes.
edTPA Rubric Language
Task 1–3 commentaries using precise rubric descriptors, evidence indicators, and subject-specific handbook language per the current edTPA scoring guides.
ISTE Standards & EdTech Integration
Technology integration aligned to ISTE Standards for Students. Tools documented include Kahoot, Nearpod, Padlet, Seesaw, and Google Classroom workflows.
Customized for Every Grade Band
Instructional design changes significantly across grade levels. We adapt language, pacing, activity type, assessment format, and differentiation strategy to the developmental stage and subject complexity of each grade band.
Early Childhood (PreK–Grade 2)
Ages 3–8
Lesson plans for early childhood classrooms embed foundational literacy (phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension) and early numeracy (number sense, counting, basic operations) into concrete, manipulative-based activities. Learning centers, read-aloud structures with text-dependent questions, morning meeting formats, and sensory exploration activities are built into the instructional sequence.
Transition management, routine procedures, and behavior expectations are documented explicitly — critical elements for this age group that student teachers frequently omit, causing rubric point deductions.
Elementary (Grades 3–5)
Ages 8–11
Upper elementary lessons use gradual release structures (I Do, We Do, You Do) explicitly mapped through the instructional sequence. Cooperative learning structures — Think-Pair-Share, Jigsaw, numbered heads, inside-outside circle — are built into group work sections with clear student roles, time allocations, and accountability mechanisms.
Subject-area integration (ELA plus Social Studies, Math plus Science) is addressed where the assignment requires cross-curricular connections. Technology integration follows ISTE Standards with specific tool use documented in the materials section.
Secondary (Grades 6–12)
Ages 11–18
Secondary plans are subject-specific: ELA, History/Social Studies, Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Algebra, Geometry, and electives. Objectives reflect higher Bloom’s levels — analysis, evaluation, and synthesis. Instructional strategies include Socratic Seminar facilitation guides, debate structures, close reading annotation protocols, lab report frameworks, and project-based learning designs.
Classroom discussion management procedures, student autonomy structures, and academic language scaffolding (sentence starters, discussion norms, domain vocabulary pre-teaching) are documented for each activity phase.
Special Education (All Grade Levels)
Cross-grade
Special education plans require explicit alignment to each student’s IEP goals, legally mandated accommodations (which do not change the curriculum), and modifications (which do). We document the accommodation list — extended time, preferential seating, reduced distractors, calculator use, text-to-speech — separately from modifications — reduced assignment length, alternative format, simplified reading level.
UDL principles are embedded throughout: multiple means of representation, multiple means of engagement, and multiple means of expression. Positive behavioral support strategies are included where IEP goals require them.
From Brief to Classroom-Ready Plan
Submit Your Assignment Brief
Upload your assignment prompt, course rubric, any required template, subject area, grade level, topic, standard codes, and required instructional model. Include student population context — class size, ELL percentage, number of students with IEPs — so we can write an accurate differentiation section. We accept Word, PDF, and image files.
Select Level, Deadline, and Scope
Choose your academic level and deadline. For curriculum units, IEP sets, or edTPA commentary packages, specify the full scope so we can confirm the deliverable and timeline. All pricing is locked before work begins — no charges are added after order acceptance.
Expert Matching
Your order is assigned to a writer whose background matches your subject, grade band, and document type. Elementary ELA plans go to literacy specialists. Secondary science plans go to STEM educators. IEPs go to special education experts. edTPA commentaries go to writers experienced with the specific subject handbook. Curriculum unit designs go to writers with formal UbD training.
Quality Review
A senior education editor reviews every completed document for: standards accuracy (codes verified against the official standards document), objective quality (Bloom’s level appropriate and measurable), instructional alignment (activities address the objective directly), assessment validity (the assessment measures what the objective states it will measure), and differentiation completeness (at least three learner profiles addressed with specific strategies).
Delivery & Free Revisions
You receive the final editable Word or Google Docs file before your deadline. If any section does not match your rubric requirements or assignment instructions, submit a revision request at no cost. We revise within the original scope until the document fully satisfies your specifications.
What Every Order Includes
M.Ed & Ed.D Writers
Every education document is written by a specialist with an advanced degree in Education or a related field and documented teaching or curriculum experience.
Fully Editable Files
Delivered in Microsoft Word (.docx) or Google Docs. Every section is unlocked so you can adjust timing, language, or activities for your specific class before submission.
Unlimited Revisions
Request revisions within the scope of your original brief at no extra charge until the document fully satisfies your rubric or submission requirements.
24/7 Support
Live messaging available around the clock for order status, revision requests, and deadline adjustments on urgent orders.
Meet Our Education Specialists
Our education writers hold M.Ed and PhD degrees in Education, Curriculum Design, Special Education, and Educational Leadership. Each writer is verified through a structured application and sample-order evaluation.
Zacchaeus Kiragu
Curriculum Design
M.Ed Education. Specialist in lesson planning, unit curriculum design, Understanding by Design (UbD), assessment rubric development, and pedagogical theory application. Experienced with CCSS and NGSS alignment across elementary and secondary contexts.
Dr. Simon Njeri
Education Policy & Sociology
PhD Sociology of Education. Specialist in educational equity, culturally responsive pedagogy, social foundations of education, Ed.D action research projects, and education policy analysis. Published researcher in peer-reviewed education journals.
Linda Mwangi
Special Education
M.Ed Special Education. Specialist in IEP writing, 504 plan development, differentiated instruction, and UDL framework application. Experienced with students with learning disabilities, autism spectrum disorder, and emotional-behavioral disorders across elementary and secondary settings.
Amara Osei
STEM Education
MSc Science Education. Specialist in NGSS-aligned inquiry-based lesson plans, 5E model design, STEM curriculum units, and edTPA Task 1–3 commentary for secondary science candidates. Experienced with lab-based and field-based learning contexts.
Rachel Kimani
Early Childhood & Literacy
M.Ed Early Childhood Education. Specialist in PreK–Grade 2 lesson planning, foundational literacy instruction (phonics, fluency, comprehension), running record analysis, play-based learning frameworks, and early childhood curriculum design aligned to developmental milestones.
Student Teacher Success Stories
“Zacchaeus wrote the unit plan for my Gatsby ELA unit and it was exactly what my cooperating teacher and university supervisor expected. Every standard was cited correctly, the differentiation section covered my ELL students with specific sentence frames. Saved my practicum semester.”
Emily R.
Secondary Ed Major, USA
“The edTPA Task 1 commentary was the piece I could not get right alone. The writer used the rubric language correctly throughout — ‘whole-class patterns,’ ‘learning segment,’ ‘central focus’ in the right places. Passed on first submission. Did not need to resubmit any task.”
Michael K.
Student Teacher, Illinois
“Needed IEP goals for three students with different disability profiles. Every goal had a measurable baseline, target behavior, criterion for mastery, and timeline. The accommodation and modification lists were legally distinct and accurate. My cooperating teacher had no corrections.”
Sarah P.
M.Ed Special Education, Canada
“A full 5E science lesson plan on ecosystems for Grade 5. The Explore phase had a hands-on food web activity with a materials list. The Evaluate phase had a tiered exit ticket rubric — different complexity for on-level, ELL, and advanced students. Grade A from my professor.”
Tom N.
Elementary Education, Australia
“Dr. Simon produced 28 pages of literature review for my Ed.D capstone on teacher retention in urban schools, citing 42 peer-reviewed sources synthesized into themes. Not a source-by-source annotation — an actual analytical review. My committee approved it without revision requests.”
Nina R.
Ed.D Candidate, UK
“Teaching philosophy for a secondary teaching application. The writer cited Vygotsky’s ZPD and Ladson-Billings’ culturally responsive framework, connected each to specific classroom practices I described in my notes. Theory was applied, not just listed. Got the interview.”
Ben W.
Secondary Teacher Candidate, USA
Pricing for Education Writing
Rates are set by academic level and deadline. IEP packages and Ed.D capstone components are quoted by scope. All prices confirmed before work begins.
Undergraduate
Pre-service teacher lesson plans, education course assignments, practicum planning documents.
- Standards-aligned objectives
- Full instructional sequence
- Differentiation section (3 profiles)
- Editable Word / Google Docs
Master’s / M.Ed
Most PopularGraduate curriculum units, teaching philosophy statements, edTPA commentary, and IEP writing.
- All Undergraduate features
- UbD curriculum framework
- edTPA rubric alignment
- Theory-grounded rationale sections
Doctoral / Ed.D
Ed.D capstones, improvement dissertations, action research literature reviews, and policy analyses.
- PhD-level sourcing (40+ sources)
- PDSA improvement framework
- Systematic literature review
- Committee-ready formatting
Urgent Delivery Available
Practicum due tomorrow? We offer urgent delivery for lesson plans in as little as 12 hours. Surcharges apply: 1.2× for 3-day, 1.5× for 12-hour. Curriculum units and IEP sets require a minimum of 48 hours regardless of urgency level.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do you support edTPA requirements?
Yes. Our writers produce Task 1, Task 2, and Task 3 commentaries that cite specific evidence from lesson artifacts, name whole-class patterns in student learning, and link every instructional decision to student context or theory — as required by the edTPA scoring rubrics. We cover all subject-specific handbooks currently in use, including Elementary Literacy, Elementary Mathematics, Secondary ELA, Secondary Science, and Early Childhood Education.
Can you write lesson plans for special education students?
Yes. We write fully differentiated plans with IDEA-compliant accommodation and modification lists (documented separately, as they are legally distinct). Plans include at least three differentiated learner profiles. IEP-aligned accommodations are written to match stated IEP goals. We cover LD, ASD, intellectual disabilities, EBD, and speech-language impairments.
Which state standards frameworks do you work with?
We work with CCSS (ELA and Math), NGSS, TEKS (Texas), Virginia SOLs, Florida NGSSS, Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks, and California ELD Standards, among others. We cite the exact standard code and standard language in every learning objective and align activities and assessments to the same code.
Are the lesson plans delivered in editable format?
Yes. All documents are delivered as editable Microsoft Word (.docx) or Google Docs files. No sections are locked. You can modify timing, activities, vocabulary lists, or differentiation strategies before submission or classroom use.
How long does delivery take?
Standard delivery is 7 or more days. Urgent options: 3-day and 12-hour for single lesson plans. Curriculum units and IEP document sets require a minimum of 48 to 72 hours due to document complexity. Ed.D capstone chapters require at least 7 days. All deadlines are confirmed at order submission before payment is taken.
What instructional models do you use?
We write plans in the 5E Inquiry Model, SIOP Model (with dual content and language objectives), Madeline Hunter Direct Instruction, Understanding by Design (Backward Design), Culturally Responsive Teaching frameworks, and the Gradual Release of Responsibility model. Specify your required model when ordering and include any model-specific template from your professor.
Can you write IEP goals for a specific disability type?
Yes. We write SMART annual goals with baseline, target behavior, mastery criterion, and evaluation schedule for specific learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, autism spectrum disorder, emotional-behavioral disorders, and speech-language impairments. Accommodation and modification lists are documented separately per IDEA requirements. Transition planning sections are included for students aged 16 and above.
Do you write teaching philosophy statements?
Yes. Philosophy statements are grounded in named pedagogical theory — Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development, Freire’s critical pedagogy, Ladson-Billings’ culturally responsive teaching, Bandura’s social learning theory, or UDL — and connected to concrete classroom practices you describe. Length and formality are calibrated to whether the statement is for a course portfolio, graduate program application, or competitive teaching position.