Causal Series per Accidens and per Se
A guide to a core philosophical distinction.
Understanding the distinction between a causal series per accidens and a causal series per se is crucial. It’s the key that unlocks some of the most profound arguments in metaphysics and theology, particularly those concerning the existence of a First Cause. This guide offers a solid foundation for your academic work.
Order Your Custom Paper NowThe Core Distinction: Per Se vs. Per Accidens
Understanding the bedrock of the philosophical discussion.
An Overview of Causal Series
The philosophical distinction between a causal series per accidens and a causal series per se is fundamental. The difference lies in the nature of the dependence of a cause on its prior cause. A causal series per se, or an essential causal series, is one where the causality of each member is dependent on the simultaneous operation of the prior member. The series is hierarchical and synchronous. For instance, a hand moving a stick, which in turn moves a rock. The rock’s motion is dependent on the hand’s motion at that very moment. This chain cannot continue without the first cause (the hand) operating at the same time as the final effect (the rock’s motion).
In contrast, a causal series per accidens, or an accidental causal series, is a chain of causes in a temporal sequence. The action of a prior cause is completed before the action of the subsequent cause begins. For example, a father begets a son, and the son later begets a grandson. The son’s ability to beget a grandson does not depend on the father’s continued existence. This distinction is crucial for understanding causality in philosophical research because it separates continuous dependency from a simple sequence of events.
Essential Concepts of Causal Series per Se
Examining the hierarchical nature of essential causality.
A Hierarchical and Simultaneous Chain
The core concepts of an essential causal series are rooted in its hierarchical nature. Each cause acts as an instrument of the prior cause. The motion of the stick is not inherent to it; it is derived from the hand’s motion. The series is ordered and dependent in such a way that if any member is removed, the entire chain of effects ceases. This dependency is what makes the series simultaneous. It’s not about the past, but what is happening now. This concept is fundamental to complex academic writing in metaphysics, where the very structure of being is under examination. A new article in the History of Ideas highlights how these ideas are re-examined. The series per se is a critical concept when studying the foundational principles of philosophical theses.
Accidental Concepts of Causal Series per Accidens
Exploring the temporal and sequential nature of accidental causation.
Sequential, Not Hierarchical
A causal series per accidens operates sequentially, not hierarchically. The causality is transferred from one member to the next, and once the transfer is complete, the prior cause can be removed without affecting the effect. For example, a man who built a wall. Once the wall is built, its existence does not depend on the man. The cause and effect are not simultaneous. Because the causality is not simultaneous, this type of chain can be infinite, as there is no need for a currently operating first cause to sustain the series. This is why arguments for a First Cause focus exclusively on the series per se. A recent study on the Cosmological Argument discusses how philosophers often miss the importance of the per se distinction. This distinction can be a powerful tool when writing argumentative essays.
Historical Context: Aristotle to Aquinas
Tracing the philosophical roots of these key concepts.
The Unmoved Mover and the Five Ways
The philosophical roots of these distinctions trace back to Aristotle, who differentiated between essential and accidental causal chains. Aristotle used these ideas to develop his concept of the Unmoved Mover. Thomas Aquinas later took these Aristotelian ideas and used them for his famous Five Ways, which are proofs for the existence of God. The Second Way, the argument from efficient cause, explicitly relies on the per se causal series. For a modern perspective on this historical journey, a chapter in the book Time and Cosmology in Plato provides an excellent overview.
Implications in Academic Research
Applying this distinction to elevate your academic work.
From Description to Analysis
Applying this philosophical distinction is not a theoretical exercise. It has real-world implications for how we structure arguments and analyze phenomena. When you’re writing a paper on a topic that involves causality, correctly identifying whether a causal chain is per se or per accidens can strengthen your analysis. It helps you avoid logical fallacies and provides a clearer framework for your reasoning. This is a skill that elevates your work from merely describing events to analyzing their underlying structure. This is why students hire academic writers for technical papers to ensure accuracy and precision.
Common Pitfalls
Clarifying misunderstandings and complex aspects of the discussion.
Avoiding Confusion
One of the most common errors is confusing a per accidens chain with a per se chain. This happens because our everyday language treats all causal chains as linear and temporal. Another pitfall is assuming that a per accidens series needs a First Cause simply because it has a beginning in time. The need for a First Cause arises from the synchronous, hierarchical nature of a per se series, not from the temporal nature of an accidental one. Avoiding these mistakes requires a careful reading of philosophical texts and a clear understanding of the definitions. This is a common area where students seek freelance writing services for assistance with clarity and structure.
Client Voices
Hear from students who have benefited from our expert academic services.
Trustpilot: 3.8 | Sitejabber: 4.9
“The writer was so easy to communicate with and made sure I got a paper that was exactly what I was looking for. Highly recommend for anyone looking for quality work.”
– Sarah M., Student
“This is my third time using this service, and I’m still amazed by the quality of the work. The writers are professional, and the customer support team is always ready to help.”
– David L., Undergraduate
“The academic writer was very knowledgeable and delivered a high-quality paper on time. I’m impressed by the level of expertise and attention to detail.”
– Jessica W., Graduate Student
Meet Our Experts
Learn about the specialists who can provide expert guidance for your papers.
Michael Karimi, PhD
Lead Philosophy Writer
Michael holds a PhD in Philosophy, specializing in metaphysics and causality. He is our go-to expert for complex topics like causal series and the writings of Aquinas.
Simon Njeri, M.A.
Humanities Specialist
With a Master’s in English Literature, Simon excels at crafting nuanced essays on topics in the humanities, from literary theory to historical analysis.
Stephen Kanyi, M.Sc.
Social Sciences Expert
Stephen’s Master’s in Economics makes him an ideal choice for papers in the social sciences, data-driven reports, and economic theory analysis.
Why This Distinction Matters
The philosophical distinction between a causal series per accidens and a causal series per se is a tool for precise thought and rigorous argument. Mastering it equips you to understand and contribute to foundational debates. By recognizing the difference between a simple sequence of events and a hierarchical, dependent chain of causes, you gain a new perspective on the very nature of existence and causality.
Order Your Custom Paper Now