Best Practices to Enhance the Number of Millennial Leaders

Posted on March 22, 2023 | by Simon KN

Millennial Leaders

Best Practices to Enhance the Number of Millennial Leaders

Due to the rise in creativity and innovation worldwide, the future has been shaped and requires implicit knowledge. The need for the development of younger leaders has also been a point of concern. There are generational differences, but millennials have been regarded as the most significant part of the organizational workforce. According to Fore (2013), it brings about the new management and leadership styles that will not only revamp the different operations that are being done within the system but also ensure quality services. This paper examines the best practices a team can cultivate to enhance the number of millennial leaders.

Creation of Communication Platform: Millennials are well networked, and tech-savvy and moist cases miss the necessary skills to make them better future leaders. Therefore, creating a communication platform or forum will help them express their ideas and limit them from being self-centered. Those who cannot speak are taught professionalism and communication skills through these platforms.

Mentorship is also the best practice a team can apply to cultivate better leaders (Weirich, 2017). Organizations can organize millennials into groups and sides with a seasoned leader who takes them through various aspects of leadership practices, skills, and codes of ethics associated with them.

Social Networking: Although the millennials do not have problems associated with social networking, proper guidance is needed to boost such skills and ensure that the team is revamping and follows the accorded setup principles. They should be exposed to opportunities where they can apply their learned skills in solid form. They also support to be motivated after taking up specific projects to boost their Morales in exploring further. Overall, through adverse investment and development, millennials can be successful leaders in the future.

References

Fore, C. W. (2013). Next-generation leadership: Millennials as leaders (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University).

Weirich, B. (2017). A millennial leader’s views on the millennial workforce. Nurse Leader, 15(2), 137-139.

Communication Skills For Leaders

Posted on November 30, 2022 | by Simon KN

Communication Skills For Leaders

Develop a written sales campaign for a product of your choosing. You will develop three distinct types of written business communications to support this campaign. Select a product that you like or use. Using this product as a base, design and write the steps you would use to create a sales campaign presentation for your product that includes four components: write a minimum of two pages based on strategies with specifics related to the product you have selected. Include the elements below the presentation strategies for your sales campaign:

Describe the four common delivery methods of communicating ideas.
Recommend tips for speakers addressing the media during the campaign.
Recommend powerful visual and auditory aids to be used in the campaign.
Explain strategies that can be used to enhance the effectiveness of the sales campaign message.

Second, you will write a minimum of a one-page business letter to your supervisor explaining your campaign.

Third, you will write a half-page memo to your co-workers announcing and outlining the campaign. Finally, you will conclude your project with a one-page summary of what you learned from this writing project. Use real-life examples of how you can apply what you have learned. Include in this section any challenges you faced in the activity or feel still lie ahead in your journey for improved written communication.

A combined minimum total of four pages.

Week 5 – Assignment: Presentation – Explaining Followership to Leaders: Followserhip 101

Posted on October 31, 2022 | by Simon KN

Assignment

Presentation: Followership 101

For this task, assume that you, as an expert in Industrial/Organizational Psychology, have been called by the owner of a local medium-sized manufacturing firm who has recently learned about followership at an executive retreat. She wants you to deliver a presentation on the concept of followership and how leaders can use it to maximize their teams performance. This will be part of a short brown bag meeting, so the presentation should only be 10-12 slides (not counting the cover and references) and should include at least 200 words of notes per content slide to provide additional context to the slide content.

Length: 10-12 slides (not counting cover and references), with at least 200 words of notes per content slide.

Your presentation should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to the topic.

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post Week 5 – Assignment: Presentation – Explaining Followership to Leaders: Followserhip 101 first appeared on nursing writers.

Charismatic Leaders and Communication

Posted on May 4, 2022 | by Simon KN

Charismatic Leaders and Communication, Ohio State and Michigan Studies & McFarlane Case: Toying with Success: The McFarlane Companies

Charismatic Leaders and Communication

Do you think communication is more important to leaders now than it was in Hitler’s and FDR’s time? Explain why you think so or why you disagree. Who is a more current charismatic leader that you know of, and how are they similar to Hitler or FDR in their communication style?

Charismatic Leaders and Communication, Ohio State and Michigan Studies & McFarlane Case: Toying with Success: The McFarlane Companies

Individual assignment: McFarlane Case, p. 65 (Manning & Curtis): “Part One Video Case, Toying with Success: The McFarlane Companies”

After reading the case, answer “Questions for Discussion” 1 and 2, providing evidence for points you make.

Then, include a well thought-out and reflective 6 to 10-line personal conclusion.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

Submit your assignment AS A MICROSOFT WORD DOCUMENT.

Rubric (professor has the discretion to award points as deemed reasonable):

Complete, well thought-out responses tapping into required content, arguments well presented, all parts responded to adequately, no significant errors – 40/40
Many points made, but some connection to content missing, one part not answered, not complete discussion- 34/40
Some points made, but some connection to content missing, incomplete and/or limited discussion – 26/40
Limited discussion, limited points – 18/40
Poor in every way – 5-10/40
For grammatical and spelling errors, student may lose additional points

Charismatic Leaders and Communication, Ohio State and Michigan Studies & McFarlane Case: Toying with Success: The McFarlane Companies

Ohio State and Michigan Studies

Consider the findings from the Ohio State and Michigan studies: Good leadership requires effectiveness on two dimensions – initiating structure, commonly called task orientation, and showing consideration, commonly called employee orientation. Evaluate a leader you know using those two dimensions of good leadership. Describe how well that leader manages both those dimensions. What is the outcome of their strengths or weaknesses in those dimensions?

1. Describe a situation that would call for a more task oriented leader.
2. In what situations would a more employee oriented leader be more successful?

Which orientation do you reflect in your style of leadership? Why do you tend to lean toward that style?

Charismatic Leaders and Communication, Ohio State and Michigan Studies & McFarlane Case: Toying with Success: The McFarlane Companies

Team Assignment 1 (to be started Week 1, completed and due Week 2)

Please read the document “Team Assignments Approach and Overview” located in the Introduction & Resources area for an overview of approach and requirements for Team Assignments, and the following detailed instructions for Team Assignment 1 to be started in Week 1, and completed in Week 2.

As you know, to develop leadership skills, hands-on in this course, you are being put in virtual teams of 4. With your team members, you will complete 4 team assignments, one in each of weeks 2, 3, 5, and 6. You will do this by each team member having the opportunity to be the Leader in at least one of the Team Assignments (while others take on other specific roles that week).

Objectives of Team Assignment 1

To become aware of your leadership qualities, where and how they were developed, areas that need development, and how you could start developing your leadership qualities; and
In order to work together virtually, you will share information with your team about how and when you are available for communication, and your leadership and course goals as stated in 1) above.

Tasks and Deliverables for Team Assignment 1

Instructions: Team Assignment 1 requires you to

Get started in Week 1 to
1. individually, analyze your leadership strengths, and areas to develop and improve, based on the personal Leadership development and Course goals document (LDCG) in the Files section of the Course Menu,
2. indicate your program, experience with online courses, day and time availability, contact information (phone, chat, e-mail address), and time zones, etc… using the Communication Preferences (CP) document in the Files section of the Course Menu, and
3. communicate and share the above information in LDCG and CP documents, with your team members, by posting in Team Discussions.
Continue in week 2 to
1. share the above information with each other,
2. as a team, using the above information, plan out team roles such as leader, motivator, communicator, facilitator, etc…, for all team members, for all 4 team assignment weeks 2, 3, 5 and 6, as suggested in Team Roles document in the Files section of the Course Menu, and
3. collate all team members’ Leadership Development and Course goals and Communication Preferences information with Team roles, in ONE Word document. You may create a table in Word, or an Excel worksheet to represent the information on Leadership and Course Goals (LDCG) summary and Communication Preferences (CP) summary, and submit with the Team Roles information, all in ONE Word document.

Team assignment deliverable must be submitted in three places- at the end of the Team discussions by Team Leader, in the Files section of the Course Menu by the leader, and in your own Week 2 Team Assignment area by each team member.

To ensure productivity by each member of your team, a Team Leader and Member Report (TLMR), available in the Files section of the Course Menu, will be completed by each member of the team and posted by each member in the Team discussions between Friday and Saturday midnight, and in their own Team Assignment area along with their Team assignment deliverable/ product by Sunday 11:59pm.If the TLMR is not posted in Team discussions and own area by Sunday 11:59pm, up to 20% points may be deducted from the full points of the Team assignment.

Rubric

In general, for the weekly Team Assignment, marks will be given on the following basis:

Quality of Team deliverable/ Product: 50%
Creativity in Team deliverable/product: 10%
Individual Participation: 40%

For Team Assignment 1 (due Week 2), 65 points will be awarded.

Quality of Team deliverable/ Product: 50%. 33/65
- Leadership Development and Course Goals summary for all team members (LDCG for all): 10
- Communication Preferences summary for all team members (CP for all): 10
- Team roles for all for all 4 Team assignment weeks: 13
Creativity in Team deliverable/product: 10%. 6/65
Individual Participation in Team discussions (at least 4 times fair contribution): 40%. 26/65

Submissions Due

Don’t forget to submit your assignment.

Charismatic Leaders and Communication, Ohio State and Michigan Studies & McFarlane Case: Toying with Success: The McFarlane Companies

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post Charismatic Leaders and Communication appeared first on Top Premier Essays.

Review the performance dashboard for a health care organization, as well as relevant local, state, and federal laws and policies. Then, write a report for senior leaders in the organization that communicates your analysis and evaluation of the current state of organizational performance, including a recommended metric to target for improvement.

Posted on April 27, 2022 | by Simon KN

Review the performance dashboard for a health care organization, as well as relevant local, state, and federal laws and policies. Then, write a report for senior leaders in the organization that communicates your analysis and evaluation of the current state of organizational performance, including a recommended metric to target for improvement.IntroductionNote: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.In the era of health care reform, many of the laws and policies set by government at the local, state, and federal levels have specific performance benchmarks related to care delivery outcomes that organizations must achieve. It is critical for organizational success that the interprofessional care team is able to understand reports and dashboards that display the metrics related to performance and compliance benchmarks.Maintaining standards and promoting quality in modern health care are crucial, not only for the care of patients, but also for the continuing success and financial viability of health care organizations. In the era of health care reform, health care leaders must understand what quality care entails and how quality in health care connects to the standards set by relevant federal, state, and local laws and policies. An understanding of relevant benchmarks that result from these laws and policies, and how they relate to quality care and regulatory standards, is also vitally important.Health care is a dynamic, complex, and heavily regulated industry. For this reason, you will be expected to constantly scan the external environment for emerging laws, new regulations, and changing industry standards. You may discover that as new policies are enacted into law, ambiguity in interpretation of various facets of the law may occur. Sometimes, new laws conflict with preexisting laws and regulations, or unexpected implementation issues arise, which may warrant further clarification from lawmakers. Adding partisan politics and social media to the mix can further complicate understanding of the process and buy in from stakeholders.How many health care laws can you name that affect your practice in your current or future workplace? How do they impact your daily work? How many regulatory agencies oversee the types of services your health care organization provides? Which regulatory agencies apply to your workplace setting? Are you familiar with the process of complying with those agencies in order to maintain certification? You might be overwhelmed as you consider these broad questions.Demonstration of ProficiencyBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:Competency 1: Analyze the effects of health care policies, laws, and regulations on organizations, interprofessional teams, and personal practice.Analyze challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a heath care organization or an interprofessional team.Competency 3: Lead the development and implementation of ethical and culturally sensitive policies that improve health outcomes for individuals, organizations, and populations.Advocate for ethical action in addressing a benchmark underperformance, directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders.Competency 4: Evaluate relevant indicators of performance, such as benchmarks, research, and best practices, for health care policies and law for patients, organizations, and populations.Evaluate dashboard metrics with regard to benchmarks set by local, state, or federal health care policies or laws.Evaluate a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or an interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance.Competency 6: Apply various methods of communicating with policy makers, stakeholders, colleagues, and patients to ensure that communication in a given situation is professional, clear, efficient, and effective.Communicate evaluation and analysis in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.PreparationFor this assessment, you may choose one of the following three options for a performance dashboard to use as the basis for your benchmark evaluation.Option 1: Dashboard and Health Care Benchmark Evaluation SimulationYou may use the data presented in the Dashboard and Health Care Benchmark Evaluation media piece as the basis for your assessment submission.If you decide to use the simulation dashboard for your evaluation, review the dashboard, as well as relevant local, state, and federal laws and policies. Consider the metrics within the dashboard that are falling short of the prescribed benchmarks.Option 2: Actual Dashboard From a Professional Practice SettingIf you choose an actual dashboard from a professional practice setting for your evaluation, be sure to add a brief description of the organization and setting that includes:The size of the facility that the dashboard is reporting on.The specific type of care delivery.The population diversity and ethnicity demographics.The socioeconomic level of the population served by the organization.Note: Ensure that your data is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant. Do not use any easily identifiable organization or patient information.Option 3: Hypothetical Dashboard Based on a Professional Practice SettingIf you have a sophisticated understanding of dashboards that are relevant to your own practice, you may also construct a hypothetical dashboard for your evaluation, based on that setting. Your hypothetical dashboard must present at least four different metrics, at least two of which must be underperforming the relevant benchmark set forth by a federal, state, or local laws or policies. In addition, be sure to add a brief description of the organization and setting that includes:The size of the facility that the dashboard is reporting on.The specific type of care delivery.The population diversity and ethnicity demographics.The socioeconomic level of the population served by the organization.Note: Ensure that your data is HIPAA compliant. Do not use any easily identifiable organization or patient information.InstructionsStructure your report in such a way that it would be easy for a colleague or supervisor to locate the information they need. Be sure to cite relevant local, state, or federal health care laws or policies when evaluating metric performance against prescribed benchmarks. Cite an additional 2–4 credible sources to support your analysis and evaluation of the challenges in meeting the benchmarks, the potential for performance improvement, and your advocacy for ethical action.You may wish to review the Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation Example [DOC] for additional support in planning and developing your submission for this assessment.Note: The tasks outlined below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide.In your report, be sure to:Evaluate dashboard metrics against the benchmarks set by local, state, or federal health care laws or policies.Which metrics are below the mandated benchmarks in the organization? Evaluate weaknesses within the entire set of benchmarks.What are the local, state, or federal health care laws or policies that set these benchmarks?Analyze challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for the organization or for an interprofessional team.What are the specific challenges or opportunities that the organization or interprofessional team might have in meeting the benchmarks? For example, consider:The strategic direction of the organization.The organization’s mission.Available resources:Staffing.Operational and capital funding.Physical space.Support services (any ancillary department that supports a specific care unit in the organization, such as a pharmacy, cleaning services, and dietary services).Cultural diversity in the organization.Cultural diversity in the community.Organizational processes and procedures.How might these challenges be contributing to benchmark underperformance?Evaluate a benchmark underperformance in the organization or interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance.Which metric is underperforming its benchmark by the greatest degree?Which benchmark underperformance is the most widespread throughout the organization or interprofessional team?Which benchmark affects the greatest number of patients?Which benchmark affects the greatest number of staff?How does this underperformance affect the community the organization serves?Where is the greatest opportunity for improvement in the overall quality or performance of the organization or interpersonal team—and ultimately in patient outcomes?Advocate for ethical action in addressing the benchmark underperformance that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance.At which group of stakeholders should your advocacy be directed? Which group could be expected to take the appropriate action to improve the benchmark metric?What are some ethical actions that the stakeholder group could take that support improved benchmark performance?Why should the stakeholder group take action?Communicate your findings and recommendations in a professional and effective manner.Ensure that your report is well organized and easy to read.Write clearly and logically, using correct grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.Integrate relevant sources to support your arguments, correctly formatting source citations and references using current APA style.Did you cite relevant local, state, or federal health care laws or policies when discussing the mandated benchmarks?Did you cite an additional 2–4 credible sources to support your analysis, evaluation, and advocacy?Additional RequirementsStructure: Include a reference page.Length: 2–5 pages should be sufficient for presenting a thorough and concise evaluation, not including any pages for presenting your data and your reference page.References: Cite 2-4 current scholarly or professional resources.Format: Use APA style for references and citations.You may wish to refer to the following APA resources to help with your structure, formatting, and style:APA Style and Format.APA Paper Tutorial.APA Paper Template.Font: Times New Roman font, 12 point, double-spaced for narrative portions only.Grading Rubric:1) Evaluate dashboard metrics with regard to benchmarks set by local, state, or federal health care policies or laws.Passing Grade: Evaluates dashboard metrics with regard to benchmarks set by local, state, or federal health care policies or laws, and identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty (where further information could improve the evaluation).2) Analyze challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a heath care organization or an interprofessional team.Passing Grade: Analyzes challenges that meeting prescribed benchmarks can pose for a heath care organization or an interprofessional team, and identifies assumptions on which the analysis is based.3) Evaluate a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or an interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance.Passing Grade: Evaluates a benchmark underperformance in a heath care organization or an interprofessional team that has the potential for greatly improving overall quality or performance; defends reasoning for selecting this benchmark over another with similar potential for improvement.4) Advocate for ethical action in addressing a benchmark underperformance, directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders.Passing Grade: Advocates for ethical action in addressing a benchmark underperformance, directed toward an appropriate group of stakeholders, and recommends criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of the recommended action.5) Communicate evaluation and analysis in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.Passing Grade: The evaluation and analysis are professional, effective, and insightful; the content is clear, logical, and persuasive; grammar, punctuation, and spelling are without errors.6) Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.Passing Grade: Integrates relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Citations are free from all errors.

Distinguish leadership characteristics in terms of communication within their team and in collaboration with other disciplines in exemplary leaders and managers encountered in everyday nursing practice.

Posted on April 6, 2022 | by Simon KN

Distinguish leadership characteristics in terms of communication within their team and in collaboration with other disciplines in exemplary leaders and managers encountered in everyday nursing practice.

Nurse Leadership Order Description Â Summary: To help students distinguish leadership characteristics in terms of communication within their team and in collaboration with other disciplines in exemplary leaders and managers encountered in everyday nursing practice. Identifying communication, teamwork, and collaboration characteristics helps students become aware of professional behaviors associated with achieving the mission of professional ¦Â Continue reading

From moment to moment a nurse leader’s day involves communication—with patients families colleagues supervisors and so on.

Posted on April 4, 2022 | by Simon KN

Think of a particular day you spent working in a health care environment, and consider three or four distinct points in time. For each point of time, consider the following: With whom did you interact? Which forms of communication did you use? What issues were communicated about—did they seem to be light-hearted or sensitive? Straightforward or complicated? How would you describe the pace of the interactions and your work?
As you consider these questions, it becomes clear that communication can be quite complex, with many layers of meaning that shape the experience for everyone involved. How could this awareness help you to understand instances of ineffective communication when they arise?
To prepare:
Review the information in Chapter 19 of the course text, as well as the assigned articles.
Reflect on an incident involving ineffective communication within your organization or another health care setting. Consider this incident through the lens of the communication process outlined in Figure 19.1 of the course text (p. 439).
What barriers contributed to this incident? What other challenges may have influenced this situation?
Using the information presented in the other Learning Resources, consider what could have been done to prevent or address the ineffective communication. Why do you think the use of these strategies would have resulted in better outcome(s)?

Post (1) a summary of an incident involving ineffective communication. (2) Describe communication barriers and other challenges that contributed to the incident. (3) Propose one or more strategies that could have been employed to promote a better outcome. (4) Be sure to refer to elements of the communication process.
Required Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
Readings
Marquis, B. L., & Huston, C. J. (2015). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing: Theory and application (8th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.

Review Chapter 19, “Organizational, Interpersonal, and Group Communication”
Gifu, D., Dima, I. C., & Teodorescu, M. (2014). New communication approaches vs. traditional communication. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, (20), 46-55.

Retrieved from Walden Library Databases.

The study highlights some communication instances of actual approach of human society evolution in contrast with traditional communication.
Johansson, C., Miller, V. D., Hamrin, S. (2014) Conceptualizing communicative leadership: A framework for analyzing and developing leaders’ communication competence, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 19 (2), 147 – 165.

Retrieved from Walden Library Databases.

Excerpt from Abstract: Four central communicative behaviors of leaders (i.e. structuring, facilitating, relating, and representing), eight principles of communicative leadership, and a tentative definition are presented. A communicative leader is defined as someone who engages employees in dialogue, actively shares and seeks feedback, practices participative decision making, and is perceived as open and involved.
Manojlovich, M., Harrod, M., Holtz, B., Hofer, T., Kuhn, L., & Krein, S. L. (2015). The Use of Multiple Qualitative Methods to Characterize Communication Events Between Physicians and Nurses. Health communication, 30(1), 61-69.

Retrieved from Walden Library Databases.

What might be the motivation behind this leaders career choice, according to Adlers theory?

Posted on September 28, 2021 | by Simon KN

What might be the motivation behind this leaders career choice, according to Adlers theory?.

Sigmund Freud, although one of the best-known personality theorists, is probably also one of the most controversial in the field of psychology. When starting to consider theories of personality, one must begin with a look at Sigmund Freud, as he was one of the first theorists to develop a psychoanalytical theory that was based on real-life patients and not studies conducted in a lab. Even if you do not agree with his theories, he is the starting point from which many other theorists have begun. Specifically, he was concerned with the development of the personality and how it created the neuroses he saw in many of his patients.

Research Freud’s theories using your textbook, the Internet, and the Argosy University online library resources. Based on your research, respond to the following:

What do you consider to be Freud’s most significant contribution to the discipline of psychology? Of his different theories, which one do you feel is the most controversial? What life factors and sociocultural factors do you think led Freud to come to the conclusions that he did? Why do many people disagree with the development of Freud’s theories? In general psychology and even popular culture today, there are a number of concepts that are based in Freudian theory that many do not realize stem from him. Identify a few ideas and terms that can be traced back to Freud. Write your initial response in 4–5 paragraphs. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.

SECOND ASSIGNMENT !!! As we have seen this week when looking at both psychoanalytic and neo-psychoanalytic theory, much of our mental health and success in adulthood is related to the events and relationships of our childhood. Much like Freud, Alfred Adler believed that childhood events are pivotal for the adult. For Adler, his pivotal childhood events were the development of rickets which kept him from walking until the age of four and contracting a near-fatal case of pneumonia at age five. These events served to inculcate a lifelong ambition which centered around his becoming a physician in order to focus on the curing of deadly diseases.

According to Alfred Adler, all people have moments when they feel inferior. For many, such moments will lead them to strive to compensate for that weakness. When this happens, it leads to what he calls “superiority striving,” in which the person is motivated by his or her feelings of inferiority to overcome and strive for betterment, achievement, and perfection.

It is important to note that superiority striving is different from simply striving for power. Adler considered this an unhealthy desire because the sole goal is power. The way that someone strives to meet his or her goals from an Adlerian point of view is referred to as a style of life.

Adler is also known for his study of birth order and its impact on personality. Research Adler’s theory using your textbook, the Internet, and the Argosy University online library resources. Based on your research, respond to the following:

Choose a social or political leader (current or past) to examine through an Adlerian framework of superiority striving and style of life. Superiority Striving What might be the motivation behind this leader’s career choice, according to Adler’s theory? What was this person’s perceived inferiority or weakness? How did this person obtain his or her high level of superiority striving? For example, Franklin Roosevelt’s bout with polio may have been responsible for some of his motivation. Style of Life What was his/her goal and unique style of life that could be used to achieve this goal? What steps did this person take to overcome their perceived inferiority? Did this leader act out of social interest or for personal gain? What was the long-term outcome of his/her striving? Birth Order How would you apply Adler’s theory of birth order to this personality? Format your paper so it is double-spaced, in 12-point Times New Roman font, and with normal one-inch margins. Include a title page with a running head, an abstract, and a reference page. Do this for all the papers for this course.

Write a 2–3-page paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.

Of his different theories, which one do you feel is the most controversial? What life factors and sociocultural factors do you think led Freud to come to the conclusions that he did? Why do many people disagree with the development of Freud’s theories? In general psychology and even popular culture today, there are a number of concepts that are based in Freudian theory that many do not realize stem from him. Identify a few ideas and terms that can be traced back to Freud. Write your initial response in 4–5 paragraphs. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.

Write a 2–3-page paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.

What might be the motivation behind this leaders career choice, according to Adlers theory?

1. Identify and critically analyse and discuss the communication challenges that a leader would expect to encounter in relation to the cultural diversity of many Australian organisations. 2. Critically discuss how leaders can address the ethical issues related to the cultural diversity in many Australian organisations.

Posted on September 23, 2021 | by Simon KN

1. Identify and critically analyse and discuss the communication challenges that a leader would expect to encounter in relation to the cultural diversity of many Australian organisations.
2. Critically discuss how leaders can address the ethical issues related to the cultural diversity in many Australian organisations.
3. Identify, synthesise and critically discuss an optimal mix of leadership styles/behaviours which would be aligned with managing culturally diverse workplaces; these should be sufficiently flexible, and able to be appropriately adopted in Australian organisations.

This assessment task requires that you synthesise your understanding of organisational culture and leadership with your theoretical and practical knowledge of OB in Australian organisations. The focus of this activity is to determine how the practice of OB must be redesigned and realigned in multiethnic/multicultural contexts to ensure cultural appropriateness and to achieve organisational effectiveness.

Scenario
Australia has one of the world’s most culturally diverse workforces. Managing different cultural workgroups has ongoing implications on the success of the organisation. However, cultural differences leading to conflicts caused by ineffective communication and increasing moral and ethical degradation at workplaces continue to be issues of growing concern. Furthermore, as the workforce becomes more diverse and multigenerational, labour power may force improvement in the employment relationship and call for different kinds of leaderships. Recently, exploratory studies conducted in Australia have examined the blend of leadership styles/behaviours that different cultural workgroups preferred their managers to exhibit.

Using both literature and publicly available data:
1. Identify and critically analyse and discuss the communication challenges that a leader would expect to encounter in relation to the cultural diversity of many Australian organisations.
2. Critically discuss how leaders can address the ethical issues related to the cultural diversity in many Australian organisations.
3. Identify, synthesise and critically discuss an optimal mix of leadership styles/behaviours which would be aligned with managing culturally diverse workplaces; these should be sufficiently flexible, and able to be appropriately adopted in Australian organisations.

Presentation

The assignment should be in the form of an academic essay. Use a concise title that reflects the key issues. Use appropriate subheadings to organise the material. These will help the reader understand the development of the logic of you argument. By scanning just the subheadings, the reader should be able to gain an understanding of the key issues in you argument.

The essay should begin with an Introduction that orientates the reader towards how you are going to approach the material that you intend to cover. It provides a brief overview of the key questions, the logical progression of you argument, and you main conclusion/s.

The Discussion section should integrate your research and ideas into key arguments.

The Conclusion should comment on the significance of your argument/s in relation to the key issue/s and consider the implication for practice.

Use an academic style of writing and correct APA6 referencing. Include a Reference section at the end (not included in the word count).

Rationale

The purpose of the assignment is to build up a specific understanding of managing a multicultural workforce and behavioural practices. This is a multi-strand knowledge gathering research that focuses on critical strategic issues in leadership and employee behaviour.

Marking criteria

There are three key themes to be addressed, all in relation to culturally diverse Australian organisations.

Identifiy, critically analyse and discuss the communication challenges that a leader would expect to encounter in culturally diverse Australian organisations (10 marks – see marking guide below: Information=3; Critique=3; Application=4).
Critically discuss how leaders can confront the ethical issues related to culturally diverse workforces in Australian organisations (10 marks – (10 marks – see marking guide below: Information=3; Critique=3; Application=4).
Identify and critically discuss the appropriate leadership models/styles for managing culturally diverse workplaces in Australian organisations (10 marks – see marking guide below: Information=3; Critique=3; Application=4).

Correct use of spelling, puncuation, grammar, syntax, and sematics; well-organised structure; the use of academic style of writing and the correct use of APA6 referencing (10 marks).

Assignment 4 Case Study: Management and Leadership with culturally diverse workforces – 40% of Final Mark

NAME: MARK: /40

Criteria	HighDistinction 84-100%	Distinction75 – 84%	Credit65 – 74%	Pass50 – 64%	Fail49%
INFORMATION RELEVANCE & DEPTH MARK: / 9	Highly proficient and evidence of rigorous use of a wide range of relevant peer-reviewed literature. All key issues relating to task themes of communication, ethics and leadership, expertly canvassed	Scholarly use of a wide range of relevant peer-reviewed literature.Most key issues relating to task themes of communication, ethics and leadership identified	Used an adequate range of relevant peer-reviewed literature. An acceptable number of key issues relating to task themes of communication, ethics and leadership identified	Limited use of relevant peer-reviewed literature. Some key issues identified relating to task themes of communication, ethics and leadership	Insufficient or unacceptable ranges of relevant peer-reviewed literature consulted. Few or no key issues relating to communication, ethics and leadership identified
CRITIQUE, ARGUMENT – EVIDENCE, EVALUATION MARK: / 9	Logical argument developed in a scholarly fashion supported by critical evaluation of evidence. Considers alternative interpretations, limitations, and significance of context. Conclusion draws argument together in and coherent and scholarly manner.	Logically developed argument clearly supported by comprehensive evaluation of evidence.Comprehensive conclusion	Logically developed argument supported by evidence.Effective conclusion	Argument is not well developed and supported.Conclusion evident	Argument, if evidenced, not developed or supportedSubstandard, or no merit to conclusion
APPLICATION MARK: / 12	Scholarly application of relevant literature to Australian multicultural case and considered appreciation of contextual factors. Shows deep critical reflection of, and engagement with, subject material.	Competent application of relevant literature to Australian multicultural case and consideration of contextual factors. Shows detailed critical reflection of and engagement with subject material	Application of relevant literature to Australian multicultural case and awareness of contextual factors. Critical analysis is detailed, drawing on relevant subject material.	Application of some of the relevant literature to Australian multicultural case. Critical analysis attempted with some degree of competence	Little application of relevant literature to case Australian multicultural case. Critical analysis below standard or not evident
EXPRESSION MARK: / 5	Excellence demonstrated in the use of language, spelling, grammar, syntax and semantics; well-structured organization, with good flow. Well-proofed copy.	Competent use of language, spelling, grammar, syntax and semantics; good organisation and flow.	Skilful use of language, spelling, grammar, syntax and semantics; adequate organisation and flow.	Acceptable use of language, spelling, grammar, syntax and semantics; some degree of organisation and flow. Quotations used frequently.	Substandard use of language, spelling, grammar, syntax and semantics; poor organisation and flow; revisions needed. Remediation required.
PRESENTATION MARK: / 5	Superior skill demonstrated in use of correct referencing styleProficient in paraphrasing key comments and sparing use of direct quotations. Essay expertly presented in accordance with a high standard of scholarship.	Skill demonstrated in use of correct referencing style. Paraphrased key comments and used direct quotations very sparinglyPresentation set out with a notable standard of scholarship.	Reasonable skill in use of correct referencing style. Direct quotations used sparingly.Presentation set out with an acceptable standard of scholarship.	Some inaccuracies in use of correct referencing style. . Quotations used frequently.Presentation set out with some evidence of scholarship.	Referencing is either insufficient or has significant inaccuraciesQuotations over-used and/or used when irrelevant Presentation inadequate with little regard for standards of scholarship.

Identify and critically analyse and discuss the communication challenges that a leader would expect to encounter in relation to the cultural diversity of many Australian organisations. Critically discuss how leaders can address the ethical issues related to the cultural diversity in many Australian organisations.

Posted on September 23, 2021 | by Simon KN

Identify and critically analyse and discuss the communication challenges that a leader would expect to encounter in relation to the cultural diversity of many Australian organisations.
Critically discuss how leaders can address the ethical issues related to the cultural diversity in many Australian organisations.
Identify, synthesise and critically discuss an optimal mix of leadership styles/behaviours which would be aligned with managing culturally diverse workplaces; these should be sufficiently flexible, and able to be appropriately adopted in Australian organisations.

High Performance Diverse Workplace(Scenario Based)
Value: 40%
Length: 3500 words (+/- 5%) excluding references
Submission method options
Alternative submission method
Task
This assessment task requires that you synthesise your understanding of organisational culture and leadership with your theoretical and practical knowledge of OB in Australian organisations. The focus of this activity is to determine how the practice of OB must be redesigned and realigned in multiethnic/multicultural contexts to ensure cultural appropriateness and to achieve organisational effectiveness.
Scenario
Australia has one of the world’s most culturally diverse workforces. Managing different cultural workgroups has ongoing implications on the success of the organisation. However, cultural differences leading to conflicts caused by ineffective communication and increasing moral and ethical degradation at workplaces continue to be issues of growing concern. Furthermore, as the workforce becomes more diverse and multigenerational, labour power may force improvement in the employment relationship and call for different kinds of leaderships. Recently, exploratory studies conducted in Australia have examined the blend of leadership styles/behaviours that different cultural workgroups preferred their managers to exhibit.
Using both literature and publicly available data:
1. Identify and critically analyse and discuss the communication challenges that a leader would expect to encounter in relation to the cultural diversity of many Australian organisations.
2. Critically discuss how leaders can address the ethical issues related to the cultural diversity in many Australian organisations.
3. Identify, synthesise and critically discuss an optimal mix of leadership styles/behaviours which would be aligned with managing culturally diverse workplaces; these should be sufficiently flexible, and able to be appropriately adopted in Australian organisations.
Rationale
The purpose of the assignment is to build up a specific understanding of managing a multicultural workforce and behavioural practices. This is a multi-strand knowledge gathering research that focuses on critical strategic issues in leadership and employee behaviour.

Tag: leaders:

Best Practices to Enhance the Number of Millennial Leaders

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Communication Skills For Leaders

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Week 5 – Assignment: Presentation – Explaining Followership to Leaders: Followserhip 101

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Charismatic Leaders and Communication

Charismatic Leaders and Communication, Ohio State and Michigan Studies & McFarlane Case: Toying with Success: The McFarlane Companies

Charismatic Leaders and Communication

Rubric (professor has the discretion to award points as deemed reasonable):

Ohio State and Michigan Studies

Team Assignment 1 (to be started Week 1, completed and due Week 2)

Objectives of Team Assignment 1

Tasks and Deliverables for Team Assignment 1

Rubric

Submissions Due

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Distinguish leadership characteristics in terms of communication within their team and in collaboration with other disciplines in exemplary leaders and managers encountered in everyday nursing practice.

Distinguish leadership characteristics in terms of communication within their team and in collaboration with other disciplines in exemplary leaders and managers encountered in everyday nursing practice.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

From moment to moment a nurse leader’s day involves communication—with patients families colleagues supervisors and so on.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

What might be the motivation behind this leaders career choice, according to Adlers theory?

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Legal

Other

How Our Service is Used:

Our Company