Haugen Julia versus Winston Contrast Essay Essay

Haugen Julia versus Winston Contrast Essay Essay.

In 1984, by George Orwell, the two main characters, Julia and Winston, provide a telling thrill to the readers through their passion for each other and for rebellion. Through further character analysis, one can see that Julia and Winston share similar characteristics, like rebelling against the party. But in many more ways are they very different. The brown-haired Julia, with voluptuous curves puts up a front that she is a part of the Junior Anti-Sex league and is as orthodox about the Parties values and one can get.

Upon further reading the book, Julia develops into a promiscuous, rebellious girl but does not seem to care about upsetting the government, but only wanting to have the ability to do whatever she wants, whenever she wants.

She explains to Winston about how she just wants to be able to do what she desires, like eating a piece of chocolate or marrying somebody she loves, whenever she wants. Examples of Julia’s concern for herself are evident when Winston is reading to Julia, Goldstein’s book, and she falls asleep.

This shows that she doesn’t share the same fascination as Winston so obviously does. Even so the only rebellious branch about Julia is that she is “only a rebel from the waist down” (page 179, chapter 5) meaning to say that the only reason she’s considered naughty in the eyes of the Thought Police and Party is because she likes to have casual sex.

Winston, on the other hand, is rebellious and careful mentally. He is different from Julia in that he does want to upset the order of the government and he does want to have sex, but to him it means more than just an embrace of passion, it means showing the Party that they are doing something that is considered illegal in the eyes of the Thought Police and that they are able to get away with it. He demonstrates this ability to get away with things by reading Goldstein’s book, buying the paperweight, having sex with Julia, which further proves his yearning to overthrow the Party and Big Brotherhood. As Winston reads the book, he is fascinated with what Goldstein has to say and how Ingsoc came to be in the first place, by the modification of Goldstein’s ideas.

As the two main characters of this book, it does seem fitting to have two characters that are willing to do imaginable things that might get them vaporized by the Thought Police to be together and share some of the same values. Even though Julia and Winston share the same ideas in some ways, upon further character analysis, there are some startling differences between those two.

Haugen Julia versus Winston Contrast Essay Essay

Song Analysis Essay

Song Analysis Essay.

What is the overall “message” or theme of the song? In a paragraph, summarize in your own words what the song is saying. The lyrics of the song “Hall of Fame” (by Script Ft. Will.i.Am) have an overall message to never give up and to fulfill your goals. The song is very motivational to the listener and lets you know that you can achieve anything if you put the effort to try. This song creates feeling of strength, confidence and will-power.

It gives me the desire to stand up and aim for the impossible. It encourages me to make my dreams into reality because one day I will be acknowledged for all the hard work. Everything will be worth it in the end. As written in stanza two “You can move a mountain” is an exaggeration. You can’t actually move a mountain but it’s an example showing that if you stay focused, you can accomplish the task! Find a Figure of Speech from your song.

Copy it here, and identify what type of figure of speech it is. An example of figurative language in this song is a metaphor. As written in stanza eight “Cause you burn with the brightest flame” is telling the listener that they can be bold, brave and courageous like a fierce light in destructive darkness. A flame represents energy, purity and strength. Identify any Imagery in the song. Write the line(s) here. What image is being created in the listener’s mind? “Standing in the hall of fame (yeah, yeah, yeah) And the world’s gonna know your name (yeah, yeah, yeah) ‘Cause you burn with the brightest flame (yeah, yeah, yeah)

And the world’s gonna know your name (yeah, yeah, yeah) And you’ll be on the walls of the hall of fame” When listening to the chorus the listener imagines standing alone in the hall of fame under a spotlight of glory, with the feelings of accomplishment while the world chants his/her name. The listener has reached victory and is all-mighty! What 3 Symbols will you use to represent “big ideas” from your song? Identify the 3 symbols here, and describe what they mean. The three main symbols I have chosen to represent the big ideas from my song are a lion, a staircase and a castle. The lion is a symbol of a ruler that has potential and bravery.

A lion is skilled, fearless and unstoppable. A staircase represents moving forward one step at a time to attain personal goals. It displays starting from absolute rock bottom, slowly progressing all the way up to high success. The staircase leads the way to a positive future. Lastly the castle represents royalty, power, high-class and fame which are all topics that this song mainly discusses. What colours and border are you using for your project, and why? What ideas or emotions do these colours and patterns represent?

I have chosen purple as the main background colour to create a feeling of passion and patience. Purple is a mix of both red and blue which concludes that it has all the traits of those two colours, such as energy, leadership and tranquility. Purple represents imagination and creativity. It likes to be unique and independent. Purple specifically represents royalty and power.

The second color I chose was gold to represent success, achievement and value. Gold is very eye-catching and is a winning colour. That is why I chose it, because when you win your goal in life you want to draw attention to yourself and show off. Most medals are gold or silver to show victory. Gold represents wealth and royalty as well.

Song Analysis Essay

An Analysis of Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” Essay

An Analysis of Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” Essay.

In “Shooting an Elephant,” George Orwell finds himself in a difficult situation involving an elephant. The fate of the elephant lies in his hands. Only he can make the final decision. In the end, due to Orwell’s decision, the elephant lay dying in a pool of blood. Orwell wins the sympathy of readers by expressing the pressure he feels as an Anglo-Indian in Burma, struggling with his morals, and showing a sense of compassion for the dying animal.

Readers sympathize with Orwell because they can relate to his emotions in the moments before the shooting.

Being the white “leader,” he should have been able to make an independent decision, but was influenced by the “natives” (Orwell 101). Orwell describes his feelings about being pressured to shoot the elephant: “Here I was the white man with his gun, standing in front of the unarmed crowd – seemingly the leading actor of the piece; but in reality I was only an absurd puppet pushed to and fro by the will of those yellow faces behind (101).

Everyone has been in a situation in which he or she has been expected to be a leader. For different reasons people are looked to as leaders, sometimes because of their race, ethnicity, or heritage.

In this case, Orwell was pictured as a leader because he was British and he worked for the British Empire. Readers are able to relate to the fact that he does not want to be humiliated in front of the Burmese. He declares, “Every white man’s life in the East, was one long struggle not to be laughed at” (101). Orwell compares the elephant to the huge British Empire, and just as the elephant has lost control, he feels that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys (100). Secretly he hates the British Empire and is on the side of the Burmese (97). The elephant is equivalent to the British Empire ravaging through Burma and disrupting the little bit of peace that they have. So in that instant he felt that he had to kill the elephant.

Another aspect that wins reader’s sympathy is Orwell’s struggle with what he thought was right and what the Burmese wanted him to do. The readers have a sense that he did not have ill-intent to kill the elephant. When Orwell says, ” As soon as I saw the Elephant I knew with certainty that I ought not shoot him” (99). The readers know that cruelty or hatred for the beast was not his motive. Orwell repeats the he does not want to kill it and the readers sympathize with him. Almost everyone has been in a situation were he or she could not base a decision on personal beliefs and knows that going against those beliefs is very difficult. Orwell explains, “For it is the condition of his rule that he shall spend hid life in trying to impress the ‘natives’ and so in every crisis he has got to do what the ‘natives’ expect of him” (100). Readers respect Orwell for his sense of duty. He realizes the his decision must be based on the best interest of the Burmese.

Also, Orwell showed great feelings of compassion for the dying animal. He was killing the animal because he had to. He did not feel strong and powerful, as a hunter would; he felt weak and helpless. Orwell so vividly describes the elephant’s death, almost as it were giving him pain to watch. The elephant lay, “dying, very slowly and in great agony. . .” (Orwell 102). While the elephant lay dying Orwell can feel nothing but helplessness. He describes the experience as “dreadful to see the great beast lying there, powerless to move and yet powerless to die, and not even to bee able to finish him” (102).

He felt helpless, with no bullets left in his gun; he was unable to put the elephant out of his misery. The compassion that he felt was obvious, he waited so long for the animal to die but, “could not stand it anymore and went away” (Orwell 102). The detailed description that Orwell gives of the death leaves the impression that he actually had feelings for the animal. If it were a routine killing he would have not even considered how the elephant felt.

Orwell was very detailed about his feelings about the killing through out the essay. Most readers have respect and sympathy for him because of his emotional turmoil before the shooting, his struggle with his own feelings about killing, and his feelings of sadness for the elephant.

An Analysis of Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” Essay