Comparing and Contrasting In the Heat of the Night Essay

Comparing and Contrasting In the Heat of the Night Essay.

The novel, In the Heat of the Night, and the movie based on the novel, had a lot of differences and some similarities which changed the effect of the movie if you read the novel. The theme of this story is racism and was portrayed in different ways in the movie and the novel, but both had the same idea. The main conflict in both the movie and story is a murder, but they are totally different. Different people, place and victim from the story, which changes what the plot is about.

In the Heat of the Night has some big conflicts, not only dealing with racism, prejudice and stereotypes.

The characters in the novel and movie differ, yet have some similarities. There are the officers, Sam, Virgil and Bill, who are the same people in the novel and movie but have many differences. Some people in the book aren’t even in the movie or have different names which makes quite a difference, especially if they had relationships with people in the movie.

For example, in the novel, Chief Gillespie is tall and well built, and in the movie he is short, chubby, and always chewing gum really loudly. Another example is Virgil Tibbs, he is humble and rarely talks back in the novel, “Sam took immediate command. ‘On your feet, black boy,’ he ordered, and crossed the room in five quick steps.”(15)

But in the movie, Virgil talks back almost every single time someone talks rude to him, and he is also rude in the movie about some things. Sam Wood and Virgil Tibbs become good friends in the novel, but in the movie Sam and Virgil don’t even become friends, but Virgil and Chief Gillespie became good friends. In the novel the victim’s name is Enrico Mantoli and in the movie he is called Cobert. “Ten minutes later, the body of Maestro Enrico Mantoli was brought in.”(24) In the movie, some characters like Duena Mantoli weren’t in it, which changed some of the conflicts and some of the scenes.

The conflicts in a novel or movie are very important because it is what makes the story interesting, and the novel and movie have pretty similar conflicts, but some aren’t even in the movie from the novel, or are completely different. The conflicts in the novel sometimes depend on the character like when Duena Mantoli made Delores Purdy look like an idiot, “Well,’ she said slowly, “he’s a real OK guy. I never got to meet him, but I heard talk. He’s got a real good job, steady, and a car, and I thought about him. I thought maybe he’d like me, especially ‘cause I heard he didn’t have no girl.’ ‘I’m his girl,’ Duena said.” (156/157)

Duena isn’t in the movie, so that scene never happened and changed the conflict. Another big difference was the setting of the novel, because in the movie they are in Sparta, Mississippi, and in the book they are located in Wells. Also, in the novel Virgil Tibbs is from Pasadena, California. “Where do you work?’ he demanded in a voice that told Sam the chief was ready to go home and back to bed. ‘In Pasadena California.’”(19) But in the movie, Virgil is from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The setting doesn’t change the conflicts much, but it makes them in a different place, and could make a big difference in the novel and movie.

The theme of this story is racism and how people dealt with it or were treated in the 1960s. The theme is fairly important, but the theme is pretty much the same in the novel and movie, they are both about racism, but it is sometimes portrayed in different ways. For example, in the movie, Sam Wood is always racist towards Tibbs, and in the book Sam lightens up towards the end, and isn’t as racist to him at all. “Ralph looked quickly at his guest and then back at Tibbs. ‘You can’t come in here, you know that. Go back outside. When those gentleman get through maybe one of them will bring a carton out to you.’ ‘I will,’ Sam offered.” (167) That quote shows the racism in the 1960s and how Sam lightens up to Virgil in the novel and not the movie.

In conclusion, the characters, conflict, setting and theme all have different parts and meanings in the movie than the novel. The characters are the strongest difference from the story and the movie, and go with the conflicts, setting, and theme. In the Heat of the Night has plenty of differences between the movie and novel that change the storyline a bit because of the different setting, characters, but it mostly changes by conflicts. The theme was the element of the story that remained the same, or very similar for that matter. In conclusion, the novel, In the Heat of the Night, and the movie, are very different, and only have a few similaries.

Comparing and Contrasting In the Heat of the Night Essay

Ebooks vs books Essay

Ebooks vs books Essay.

Paper and electronic books both make an excellent and effective way of reading, although paper books allow more of a precise effective reading while electronic books is often quicker and more convenient. Reading has always been one of our important and educational element. Since childhood, reading and books has always been exposed to us. Society evolution of books has completely changed and restructured our way of reading.

Paper books are described to be “traditional books” whereas electronic books are described to be “modern”; but no matter of its differences, both paper and electronic books are essential functions of reading.

In difference of the fact that readings traditional and modern have many similarities, they also have some differences. Between Paper and Electronic Books, there are loads differences as well as similarities shared.

Paper Books, for example affects the reader more differently than electronics. Though they both serve the same purpose in the matter; reading traditionally, increases the reader’s way of thinking and education.

It impacts the readers on how they express themselves; improve communication skills and opening their mind to new ideas.

It offers more of an escape to the readers, thus broadening their mind and creativity. Whereas electronic books, has the advantage to change their lightning so that it is easier for the readers to read. Like a computer, it allows the reader to have the ability to translate any given book, look up information about the book and retrieve books quickly. Based on earlier research, many people assume the price of eBooks is more or less better than buying books. Generally each book has a different price depending on if it is hard or a paper copy.

Reading electronically, there are many of websites that could give the reader books for free and some that sells them at a cheaper price. Nevertheless, paper books at least have its advantages and reasons in their price. Despite their price in new books, bookstores can offer discounts and other benefits for books of usage at lower prices than eBooks. According to publishers, printing paper books are usually accounted for only eight percent of its cost based off the publishing. However, electronic books are often cheaper because of none printing fees.

A clear difference is also the space and weight between each other. Coming in different bulky sizes, books often take more than enough space and are heavy. Carrying more than two or three around can become like a work-out. One the other hand, studies show that readers like some of the weight. With the given weight of the books, it allow readers to make sure that their items are not misplaced (Kevin O’Kelly). Despite the weight, books are known to be reliable equipment. Withstanding abuse form variations of temperature, moistures, falls and tearing, they are often known to be strong.

Even more so, they give off an appealing yet elegant look and do not involve a need of power to function. Whereas eBooks are often thin and created to weigh the amount of a smart phone. EBooks are more of viewing hi-tech software, which can carry dozen to hundreds of books. Although they are able to withstand traveling without weight, eBooks also are able to break easily. Not being durable enough, eBooks has more of a chance breaking when dropped or wet. Still rather than being an easy usage, eBooks often need connection and can only produce a reader one book at a time.

This can be problematic for a student that needed to study. In contrast, accommodating either paper or eBooks, each has their own disadvantage and advantage in reading. Each is somewhat of an advantage or disadvantage to different readers but they are both materialistic of the same thing and purpose. Similarly, both paper books and eBooks serve the purpose, for the reader to enjoy books. The decision is ultimately up to the reader to decide. Some people find that technology is convenient and reliable; while other fined that there is no reason to change things.

They just each have ways of being an advantage and a disadvantage but are very similar in ways SOURCES Couts, Andrew. “IS THERE ANY REASON TO OWN PAPER BOOKS BESIDES SHOWING OFF? NOT REALLY. ” Web. 26 October 2013 Mandly, Leah. “Nook vs. Book. ” Daily Collegian (2010): Web. 21 Nov 2010. O’Kelly, Kevin. “EBooks vs. Print: Actually a Nonissue”. Web. 25 February 2014. Rlaforme. “Kindle vs. Nook vs. Book. ” Genera=on the Alterna=ve Voice 1984. SBI. 12 January 2010. Web. 21 November 2010. Slater, Marc. “EBooks VS Printed Books: Which Is Preferred Now? ”.

You may also be interested in the following: books vs ebooks essay

Ebooks vs books Essay

World without colour Essay

World without colour Essay.

What would the world be like without the magic colors of a rainbow? What would the world be like if people weren’t black, brown, yellow or white skinned? Would diversity exist without color? What would the world be like if we couldn’t see the bright blue of the ocean or the sky? Would the horizon exist? Would we appreciate the beauty of a sunrise or a sunset? What would the world be like without the color of the flowers? Would mother nature be so wonderful?

Most people may never have thought about what a colorful world we are living in, and few may have ever given a thought to how a world without color would be.

This is because everyone with visual ability was born into a world full of colors.

The photography of flowers and magnificent views, like the Niagara Falls, would be rather lackluster as the essence of the moment would not be able to be captured.

Colours add magnificence to a peacock’s features and excitement to hobbies like snorkeling and photography. The blue of the ocean and the sky would never be cherished without colours. Therefore, colour adds multifarious ness to nature. In fashion, if there were no colours, everything would only be patterns and designs. There would be no longer a wider range of choices when shopping. Everyone would be wearing similar types of shirts. Take for example, the make-up industry.

Colours make nature, fashion, flags and the various races much more interesting and diverse. Without colours, nature would not be appreciated as much as it is coloured. Generally, a colorless world would be thought of as having no color except black, white and grey shades. Imagine that all of a sudden, everything loses its colors. In such a situation, everything would mix with his surroundings and it would become impossible to distinguish one object from another. For example a peach and an apple would look almost identical. There would be no distinct features.

We’d lose all sight for which was which, basically normal organisms wouldn’t be able to tell the difference from one thing to another resulting in chaos. Emotionally and Mentally: Our world would seem depressing and very dark and disturbing. Some would enjoy this, while others would not because a world without colors means a world with no life. We basically need colors to help us get through the day and without them…life would be sad.

World without colour Essay

Benefits Of Traveling Essay

Benefits Of Traveling Essay.

Introduction

Hook: Traveling to many places is taking interest by people all over the world. People from all walks of life, both young and old, enjoy traveling. Traveling provides opportunities for fun, adventure and discovery. Thesis: Traveling brings us a lot of advantages.

Preview:
Experience new things and open our minds
Improve ourselves
Refreshing and revitalizing
Body
The first advantage is traveling helps us to experience new things and to open our minds to the outside world. Experience new things
Get the opportunity to meet different people from different places.

Different areas have their own unique food.
Get a chance to take part in local celebrations and festivities. When we visit places in other countries, we gain a better understanding of the people living there. Discovering different values and ways to get by in life is really exciting. Open our minds to the outside world

Experiencing different cultures can be enlightening and educational. One of the best ways to learn about different cultures is to travel.

Traveling increases our knowledge and widens our perspective, explores culture of each country. Discover similarities and differences between cultures.

It gives us a new perspective about life, helps us learn about history and geography of many places. The second advantage of traveling is it helps us to improve ourselves. Meeting new people is one of the great upsides of travelling => improve your social skills. Sometimes things don’t go according to plan while travelling => more flexible. Increases confidence and gives a sense of success.

Travel can involve a lot of waiting.(wait in lines, for flights or at restaurants) => remain patient and calm in all situations. Living situations you would never encounter at home, great experience when you come back to your daily life. The final advantage is it is refreshing and revitalizing.

Traveling gives us the opportunity to disconnect from our regular life. Put aside your daily responsibilities and focus on yourself for a moment. After the break, we feel more energize to return to work.

When you return home you’ll feel refreshed and have the motivation you felt drained of before you left. One of the best ways to remove stress, reduce tension and restore balance.

Conclusion
In conclusion, traveling has many advantages. We can experience new exciting things and learn to improve ourselves through traveling. It is a great way to escape our daily life and to enjoy ourselves for sometime.

You may also be interested in the following: traveling essay sample, traveling essay, traveling essay

Benefits Of Traveling Essay

“Waters of Babylon” and “Coyote Kills the Giant” Essay

“Waters of Babylon” and “Coyote Kills the Giant” Essay.

The tale of two journeys may seem very similar but they are also very different. In both “By the Waters of Babylon” and “Coyote Kills the Giant,” the characters John and Coyote go on a dangerous journey to test their skills and wit. Though their journeys are different, at the end they overcome their obstacles and are able to achieve their goals.

The main differences in the journeys between “By the Waters of Babylon” and “Coyote Kills the Giant” are their settings and the main characters’ purpose in their journeys.

In “By the Waters of Babylon,” the settings are the woods and the Place of Gods. The character, John, comes upon more conflicts than the Coyote in “Coyote Kills the Giant” because John is in the wilderness. While John faces two wild settings, Coyote deals with only one setting, the Giant’s belly. John interacts with the settings by himself, unlike Coyote, who has multiple people that talk to him and help him kill the giant.

Another difference between John and Coyote’s journeys is each character’s purpose. John’s purpose is to prove to his tribe that he is a man and a priest. As he continues on his journey, his purpose changes to satisfy his “hunger for knowledge” (68). He searches for the truth of his beliefs and is curious behind the “walls” of his home. On the other hand, Coyote’s purpose is to show the Old Woman she is wrong and say that he is able to kill the giant. John’s purpose seems more meaningful whereas the Coyote’s purpose is more about making himself look good. The differences between these characters and their journeys show that they have proved something of themselves.

While the settings and purposes are different, their results and some of their conflicts are similar.

Both complete and survive their journeys

Similarities:

Result is similar, but they learn different lessons (bridge)

John- Coming back home as a man with knowledge

Coyote- Hero and defeating the Giant

Conflict-external

Man vs nature

“Waters of Babylon” and “Coyote Kills the Giant” Essay

Knights Tale Compare And Contrast Movie And Book Essay

Knights Tale Compare And Contrast Movie And Book Essay.

The book and the movie have some similarities, where they use swords to fight, but the movie used more lances for jousting. Comparing both the book and the movie to our real lives, our lives don¡¦t have too much in common. In our lives we don¡¦t carry around swords, and wear armor, or compete in games with lances. Our competitions usually consist of our bare hands and feet, to fight. In a way we do have a type of sport that is almost similar to sword fighting, which is called ¡§Fencing.

¡¨ This is where the rules are almost similar but you fight in different motions. We also have games that use guns also, but they also hurt a lot, this game is called ¡§paint ball.¡¨ Where you try to hunt down your opponent and shoot him before he shoots you with his paint balls.

The time periods are different, since the book and the movie are told in the medieval times.

While ours is present twentieth century time. We drive cars, ride bikes, or some even ride the buses. In the movie and the book they had mostly rode horses, or walked. In which some cases some people still do walk now to get to certain places. The old ways are also the new ways in religion. Since we still believe in the Christian ways, like they did back in the medieval times, but mainly the English people believe in this.

They way they had lived in the medieval times, was that they lived mostly in hard concrete houses, or brick houses. They would use lanterns for their lights, or torches, sometimes even to stay warm they would build a small fire. Now we just build our houses out of wood, but there are still some that are made out of concrete and bricks. The majority of houses are built out of wood, and run on electricity, to heat the house, or to cool it down with the air conditioning. The only time that we light lanterns or fires are when we go out camping, so we bring fire wood, and other equipment¡¦s to cook with, such as a small gas stove.

Knights Tale Compare And Contrast Movie And Book Essay